Open beta Zabio is in open beta: anyone can sign up and use it in production. Models, prices and features can still change while we learn from the first customers. Tell us what breaks at hello@zabio.ai.
Tested on 25 September 2026: 2 models, Math, SQL and data queries, at 3 thinking settings, on 380 questions. Every number shows its 90% range and how many questions it rests on.
Math (hardest): the best choice among the models tested is deepseek-flash with thinking high, at $9.18 per 1,000 tasks.
SQL and data queries (hardest): the best choice among the models tested is deepseek-flash with thinking low, at $4.29 per 1,000 tasks.
For each task and difficulty, three choices among the options tested so far: best is the cheapest option that nothing else is probably better than, cheap is the cheapest option not clearly worse than the top, and balanced sits between the two.
Each dot is a model at one thinking setting: cost per 1,000 tasks across, right answers up. Up and to the left is better.
deepseek-flash
deepseek-v4-pro
Ringed: a best, balanced or cheap choice
Math
EasyMediumHardHardest
SQL and data queries
EasyMediumHardHardest
Cost per 1,000 tasks, list price, log scale. Right answers, %.
How every model compares on public benchmarks
Weekly results from Epoch AI, LMArena and LiveBench, shown as price against score for each kind of job. Zabio uses these same results to pick the model for each job.
Aggregated from public resultsRead on 1 October 2026
Writing
Price against score, MediumRanking, Medium
Rating only, not on the chart (10)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,337.7$0.36
gpt-oss-120bRating 1,323.4$0.36
gpt-4o-miniRating 1,293.1$0.36
gpt-4.1-miniRating 1,372.9$0.96
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,400.5$1.00
gpt-5-miniRating 1,373.3$1.00
llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboRating 1,292.6$1.25
claude-haiku-4-5Rating 1,415.0$2.80
mistral-medium-3-5Rating 1,421.2$4.20
gpt-4.1Rating 1,403.3$4.80
Creative writing
Price against score, MediumRanking, Medium
Rating only, not on the chart (10)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,323.2$0.36
gpt-4o-miniRating 1,293.9$0.36
gpt-oss-120bRating 1,277.8$0.36
gpt-4.1-miniRating 1,349.1$0.96
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,373.4$1.00
gpt-5-miniRating 1,323.7$1.00
llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboRating 1,285.3$1.25
claude-haiku-4-5Rating 1,387.4$2.80
mistral-medium-3-5Rating 1,400.3$4.20
gpt-4.1Rating 1,402.4$4.80
Summarizing
Price against score, MediumRanking, Medium
Pulling out data
Price against score, MediumRanking, Medium
Rating only, not on the chart (10)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,337.7$0.24
gpt-oss-120bRating 1,323.4$0.24
gpt-4o-miniRating 1,293.1$0.24
gpt-5-miniRating 1,373.3$0.60
gpt-4.1-miniRating 1,372.9$0.64
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,400.5$0.70
llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboRating 1,292.6$1.04
claude-haiku-4-5Rating 1,415.0$1.80
mistral-medium-3-5Rating 1,421.2$2.70
gpt-4.1Rating 1,403.3$3.20
Sorting into categories
Price against score, MediumRanking, Medium
Conversation
Price against score, MediumRanking, Medium
Rating only, not on the chart (7)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,364.9$0.48
gpt-oss-120bRating 1,326.8$0.48
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,419.6$1.40
gemini-3.5-flash-liteRating 1,464.6$1.48
llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboRating 1,316.5$2.08
mistral-medium-3-5Rating 1,432.9$5.40
grok-4.7Rating 1,424.7$6.16
Analysis and reasoning
Price against score, MediumRanking, Medium
Price against score, HardRanking, Hard
Price against score, HardestRanking, Hardest
Rating only, not on the chart (6)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
gpt-oss-120bRating 1,356.9$1.35
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,334.6$1.35
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,427.4$3.75
llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboRating 1,297.5$4.68
grok-4.7Rating 1,458.6$16.50
claude-sonnet-5Rating 1,511.8$21.00
Math
Nobody publishes a scored result for this one yet. The models below have a preference rating only.
Ranking, Medium
Rating only, not on the chart (30)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
gpt-oss-120bRating 1,381.1$0.36
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,338.0$0.36
gpt-4o-miniRating 1,275.4$0.36
gpt-5.4-nanoRating 1,424.7$0.66
deepseek-flashRating 1,424.8$0.72
deepseek-flash@togetherRating 1,424.8$0.72
gpt-4.1-miniRating 1,353.4$0.96
gpt-5-miniRating 1,405.0$1.00
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,401.5$1.00
gemini-3.5-flash-liteRating 1,441.9$1.24
llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboRating 1,295.8$1.25
gemini-3.8-flashRating 1,516.4$2.10
gpt-5.4-miniRating 1,438.8$2.40
deepseek-v4-proRating 1,444.8$2.64
deepseek-v4-pro@togetherRating 1,444.8$2.64
claude-haiku-4-5Rating 1,400.2$2.80
mistral-medium-3-5Rating 1,428.4$4.20
grok-4.7Rating 1,444.9$4.40
gemini-3.5-flashRating 1,496.3$4.80
gpt-4.1Rating 1,374.6$4.80
claude-sonnet-5Rating 1,473.6$5.60
gemini-3.1-pro-previewRating 1,487.9$6.40
gpt-5.4Rating 1,459.9$8.00
claude-sonnet-4-6Rating 1,463.2$8.40
claude-opus-5-5Rating 1,510.2$11.20
claude-opus-5Rating 1,522.5$14.00
claude-opus-4-8Rating 1,476.3$14.00
gpt-5.5Rating 1,499.4$16.00
claude-fable-5-1Rating 1,517.5$28.00
gpt-6-astraRating 1,490.0$28.00
Price against score, HardRanking, Hard
Price against score, HardestRanking, Hardest
Writing code
Price against score, HardRanking, Hard
Rating only, not on the chart (10)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,412.1$1.11
gpt-oss-120bRating 1,389.7$1.11
gpt-4o-miniRating 1,348.0$1.11
gpt-4.1-miniRating 1,433.0$2.96
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,469.3$3.03
gpt-5-miniRating 1,431.2$3.20
llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboRating 1,345.7$3.48
claude-haiku-4-5Rating 1,480.8$8.75
mistral-medium-3-5Rating 1,478.6$13.13
gpt-4.1Rating 1,456.1$14.80
Fixing code
Price against score, HardRanking, Hard
SQL and data queries
Price against score, MediumRanking, Medium
Using tools
Price against score, HardRanking, Hard
Rating only, not on the chart (1)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
mistral-medium-3-5Rating -0.1$19.50
Reading images
Nobody publishes a scored result for this one yet. The models below have a preference rating only.
Ranking, Medium
Rating only, not on the chart (21)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,141.6$0.36
gpt-4o-miniRating 1,065.5$0.36
gpt-5.4-nanoRating 1,196.1$0.66
gpt-4.1-miniRating 1,181.3$0.96
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,221.5$1.00
gpt-5-miniRating 1,202.0$1.00
gemini-3.5-flash-liteRating 1,266.1$1.24
gemini-3.8-flashRating 1,312.0$2.10
gpt-5.4-miniRating 1,244.9$2.40
mistral-medium-3-5Rating 1,222.4$4.20
gemini-3.5-flashRating 1,310.5$4.80
gpt-4.1Rating 1,210.3$4.80
claude-sonnet-5Rating 1,275.4$5.60
gemini-3.1-pro-previewRating 1,296.2$6.40
gpt-5.4Rating 1,291.9$8.00
claude-sonnet-4-6Rating 1,282.8$8.40
claude-opus-5Rating 1,320.9$14.00
claude-opus-4-8Rating 1,287.9$14.00
gpt-5.5Rating 1,297.3$16.00
claude-fable-5-1Rating 1,318.9$28.00
gpt-6-astraRating 1,280.1$28.00
Questions about a document
Nobody publishes a scored result for this one yet. The models below have a preference rating only.
Ranking, Medium
Rating only, not on the chart (30)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
mistral-small-2603Rating 1,358.8$0.72
gpt-4o-miniRating 1,326.2$0.72
gpt-oss-120bRating 1,324.4$0.72
gpt-5.4-nanoRating 1,402.6$1.14
deepseek-flashRating 1,447.4$1.44
deepseek-flash@togetherRating 1,447.4$1.44
gpt-5-miniRating 1,370.3$1.60
gpt-4.1-miniRating 1,389.9$1.92
gemini-3.5-flash-liteRating 1,461.6$1.96
mistral-large-2512Rating 1,417.0$2.20
llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboRating 1,313.4$3.74
gemini-3.8-flashRating 1,507.9$3.90
gpt-5.4-miniRating 1,446.7$4.20
claude-haiku-4-5Rating 1,436.3$5.20
deepseek-v4-proRating 1,471.7$5.81
deepseek-v4-pro@togetherRating 1,471.7$5.81
mistral-medium-3-5Rating 1,429.6$7.80
gemini-3.5-flashRating 1,481.5$8.40
gpt-4.1Rating 1,426.9$9.60
grok-4.7Rating 1,450.5$9.68
claude-sonnet-5Rating 1,481.8$10.40
gemini-3.1-pro-previewRating 1,498.9$11.20
gpt-5.4Rating 1,477.4$14.00
claude-sonnet-4-6Rating 1,492.4$15.60
claude-opus-5-5Rating 1,527.8$20.80
claude-opus-5Rating 1,504.8$26.00
claude-opus-4-8Rating 1,499.8$26.00
gpt-5.5Rating 1,486.6$28.00
claude-fable-5-1Rating 1,511.4$52.00
gpt-6-astraRating 1,485.6$52.00
Price against score, HardRanking, Hard
Rating only, not on the chart (11)
A preference rating is not a share of right answers, so these models cannot share the axis. They are listed with their rating instead.
claude-haiku-4-5Rating 1,420.0$12.50
gemini-3.5-flashRating 1,463.3$20.10
claude-sonnet-5Rating 1,466.1$25.00
gemini-3.1-pro-previewRating 1,443.9$26.80
gpt-5.4Rating 1,471.0$33.50
claude-sonnet-4-6Rating 1,482.2$37.50
claude-opus-5Rating 1,516.3$62.50
claude-opus-4-8Rating 1,464.1$62.50
gpt-5.5Rating 1,485.7$67.00
claude-fable-5-1Rating 1,512.6$125
gpt-6-astraRating 1,467.5$125
Price per 1,000 tasks, USD. Score, %. Greyed out: a cheaper model already scores as well. Ringed: the best, balanced and cheap choice.
Sources
Epoch AIEpoch AI, Capabilities and Benchmarking, epoch.ai/benchmarks, retrieved 2026-10-01License: CC BY 4.0Read on 1 October 2026
LMArenaLMArena leaderboard dataset (lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset on Hugging Face), retrieved 2026-10-01License: CC BY 4.0Read on 1 October 2026
These numbers come from the sources named on each row, not from Zabio's own tests. Zabio's tests are shown separately and never combined with them into one figure.
Sources test models at their own settings. A settings mismatch against how Zabio calls the model is marked on the row and lowers its weight.
Scores are compared only inside one benchmark. Task scores combine benchmarks by evidence in standard errors, so a task score is a summary, not a benchmark result.
A model missing from every source is listed as such rather than left out.
Results from our own tests have their own section.
Models tested
Each model page shows every thinking setting side by side, by task and difficulty.
deepseek-flashDeepSeekThinking off, Thinking low, Thinking high
deepseek-v4-proDeepSeekThinking off, Thinking low, Thinking high
25 September 2026deepseek-flash: First results: math and SQL at three thinking settings.
25 September 2026deepseek-v4-pro: First results: math and SQL at three thinking settings.
Questions
What is the best model for math?
Among the models tested so far, deepseek-flash with thinking high is the best choice on the hardest math questions, at $9.18 per 1,000 tasks (tested 25 September 2026).
What is the cheapest model that does math well?
On the hardest math questions, the cheap choice among the models tested so far is deepseek-flash with thinking low, at $6.38 per 1,000 tasks.
What is the best model for SQL and data queries?
Among the models tested so far, deepseek-flash with thinking low is the best choice on the hardest SQL and data queries questions, at $4.29 per 1,000 tasks (tested 25 September 2026).
What is the cheapest model that does SQL and data queries well?
On the hardest SQL and data queries questions, the cheap choice among the models tested so far is deepseek-flash with thinking low, at $4.29 per 1,000 tasks.
Does thinking make a model better?
On easy questions it barely changes the result and costs more. On the hardest questions it can add many right answers. Each model page shows every setting side by side.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the leading public benchmarks, Epoch AI, LMArena and LiveBench, refreshed every week, and from Zabio's own tests, where each model is called through Zabio's API and every answer is graded automatically. Zabio uses these same results to pick the model for each job. Each chart names its sources.
Read this first
AIME problems are public and may appear in model training data, so math results at the frontier level may be inflated. Differences between settings are the reliable part.
SQL questions were kept only when an independent model outside the test answered them correctly, which limits how hard the hardest questions are.
These results compare DeepSeek models and settings with each other. Other providers' models have not been tested in this run.
Results are not ranked when their ranges overlap. Top means nothing tested is probably better on that job. Near the top means not clearly worse than the top.
Zabio sells access to these models and earns a fee on the traffic it carries. That is why the method is public, every number has its range and date, and corrections are published as changes. No vendor pays for tests, results or placement.
DeepSeek is a trademark of its owner. Zabio uses DeepSeek models through the DeepSeek API and is not affiliated with DeepSeek.
Use the data
The results are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0. Please credit Zabio with the citation below.